CO129-353 - Public Offices - 1908 — Page 455

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

C.O. 45417 451

His Majesty's Consul to Viceroy. 11 FC 08 60itto.

CANTON, June 12th, 1869.

The undersigned has the honour to acknowledge the receipt of Your Excellency's despatch of the 6th instant, with reference to the question of stationing a guard at the Prata Shoal for the purpose of preventing acts of piracy on vessels in distress, a step which Your Excellency declines to take as not being provided for in any Treaty &c., &c.,

and in reply he begs to point out that his former communication appears to have been misunderstood, or at all events, misquoted, as in Your Excellency's reply reference is made to "stationing steam gunboats at the Prata Shoal", whereas the undersigned in his despatch made no mention whatever of gunboats, requesting only that "one or two war junks" be stationed at the Prata Shoals.

What he referred to was the ordinary class of armed junks, and he had no thought whatever of causing steam vessels to be sent to a spot for which they are so ill-adapted as that in question.

The matter is one however to which he has given careful consideration, and he must call Your

Edit History

2026-06-07 06:35:04 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
C.O. 45417 451 His Majesty's Consul to Viceroy. 11 FC 08 60itto. CANTON, June 12th, 1869. The undersigned has the honour to acknowledge the receipt of Your Excellency's despatch of the 6th instant, with reference to the question of stationing a guard at the Prata Shoal for the purpose of preventing acts of piracy on vessels in distress, a step which Your Excellency declines to take as not being provided for in any Treaty &c., &c., and in reply he begs to point out that his former communication appears to have been misunderstood, or at all events, misquoted, as in Your Excellency's reply reference is made to "stationing steam gunboats at the Prata Shoal", whereas the undersigned in his despatch made no mention whatever of gunboats, requesting only that "one or two war junks" be stationed at the Prata Shoals. What he referred to was the ordinary class of armed junks, and he had no thought whatever of causing steam vessels to be sent to a spot for which they are so ill-adapted as that in question. The matter is one however to which he has given careful consideration, and he must call Your
Baseline (Original)
C.O. 45417 451 His Majesty's Consul to Viceroy. 11 FC 08 60itto. CANTON, VOTGOLV St ay'cäsom seent of moitibbs I sidanuorod et rot vigen tressng sát biswiot of and .os tisamin alisvs bra moitamotni a'ivamoo June 12th, 1869. The undersigned has the honour to acknowledge the receipt of Your Excellency's despatch of the 6th in- stant, with reference to the question of stationing a guard at the Prata Shoala for the purpose of prevent- ing acts of piracy on vessels in distress, a step which Your Excellency declines to take as not being provided for in any Treaty &c., &c., and in reply he begs to point out that his former communication appears to have been misunderstood, or at all events, misquoted, as in Your Excellency's reply reference is made to "stationing steam gunboats at the Prata Shoal", where- as the undersigned in his despatch made no mention what- ever of gunboats, requesting only that "one or two war junks" be stationed at the Prata Shoals. What he referred to was the ordinary class of armed junks, and he had no thought whatever of causing steam vessels to be sent to a spot for which they are so ill-adapted as that in question. The matter is one however to which he has given careful consideration, and he must call Your
2026-06-07 06:35:04 · Baseline
View content

C.O.

45417

451

His Majesty's Consul to Viceroy.

11 FC 08

60itto.

CANTON,

VOTGOLV St ay'cäsom seent of moitibbs I

sidanuorod et rot vigen tressng sát biswiot of and

.os tisamin alisvs bra moitamotni a'ivamoo

June 12th, 1869.

The undersigned has the honour to acknowledge the

receipt of Your Excellency's despatch of the 6th in-

stant, with reference to the question of stationing a

guard at the Prata Shoala for the purpose of prevent-

ing acts of piracy on vessels in distress, a step

which Your Excellency declines to take as not being

provided for in any Treaty &c., &c., and in reply he

begs to point out that his former communication appears

to have been misunderstood, or at all events, misquoted,

as in Your Excellency's reply reference is made to

"stationing steam gunboats at the Prata

Shoal", where-

as the undersigned in his despatch made no mention what-

ever of gunboats, requesting only that "one or two war

junks" be stationed at the Prata Shoals. What he

referred to was the ordinary class of armed junks,

and

he had no thought whatever of causing steam vessels to

be sent to a spot for which they are so ill-adapted as

that in question. The matter is one however to which

he has given careful consideration, and he must call

Your

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.